Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting

Michael Harris II vs Shohei Ohtani

In 2026 Michael Harris II has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLDS, where the Los Angeles Dodgers won 3-1 over the Atlanta Braves.

Michael Harris II ATL

Shohei Ohtani LAD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Shohei Ohtani
G	4	4
PA	17	16
H	6	2
HR	0	0
RBI	1	0
BB	1	2
SO	2	4
SB	1	1
AVG	.375	.154
OBP	.412	.267
SLG	.625	.154
OPS	1.037	.421

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Shohei Ohtani
G	17	41
PA	65	192
H	17	37
HR	2	12
RBI	7	27
BB	1	33
SO	10	55
SB	2	2
AVG	.274	.239
OBP	.297	.379
SLG	.452	.510
OPS	.748	.889

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Shohei Ohtani
G	155	135
PA	621	618
H	174	144
HR	26	30
RBI	87	81
SB	12	11
AVG	.294	.275
OBP	.321	.377
SLG	.491	.512
OPS	.812	.889
ISO	.196	.237
BB%	3.7%	13.1%
K%	19.2%	24.6%
wOBA	.350	.379
wRC+	120	143
WAR	4.4	3.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Shohei Ohtani
G	676	1,153
PA	2,712	4,947
H	713	1,194
2B	136	218
3B	16	49
HR	99	310
RBI	342	750
BB	108	622
SO	549	1,256
SB	82	176
AVG	.278	.281
SLG	.460	.574
WAR	16.3	41.9

Michael Harris II’s full profile →Shohei Ohtani’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Michael Harris II vs

Shohei Ohtani vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.