Head to head · 2026 NLDS pitching

Chris Sale vs Tanner Scott

In 2026 Chris Sale has been worth 3.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLDS, where the Los Angeles Dodgers won 3-1 over the Atlanta Braves.

Chris Sale ATL

Tanner Scott LAD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
Statistic	Chris Sale	Tanner Scott
G	1	3
GS	1	0
IP	5.0	2.2
W	0	0
SV	0	0
SO	7	4
BB	0	1
ERA	5.40	6.75
WHIP	1.40	1.13
K/9	12.6	13.5
BB/9	0.0	3.4

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Chris Sale	Tanner Scott
G	13	12
GS	9	0
IP	46.2	11.0
W	1	0
SV	0	0
SO	66	18
BB	14	5
ERA	5.79	2.45
WHIP	1.33	0.91
K/9	12.7	14.7
BB/9	2.7	4.1

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Chris Sale	Tanner Scott
G	27	69
GS	27	0
IP	162.2	63.2
W	14	1
SO	200	82
ERA	2.16	2.83
FIP	2.29	2.10
WHIP	0.98	1.01
K/9	11.1	11.6
BB/9	1.7	2.1
FIP−	55	50
WAR	5.6	1.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Chris Sale	Tanner Scott
G	420	513
GS	339	0
IP	2,246.2	489.1
W	159	33
L	97	34
SV	12	103
SO	2,779	628
BB	518	235
ERA	2.95	3.60
WHIP	1.04	1.30
K/9	11.1	11.6
BB/9	2.1	4.3
HR/9	0.9	0.8
WAR	60.0	8.1

Chris Sale’s full profile →Tanner Scott’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Chris Sale vs

Tanner Scott vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.