Head to head · 2026 NLCS pitching

Shane Drohan vs Tanner Scott

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.9 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLCS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 4-0 over the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Shane Drohan MIL

Tanner Scott LAD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLCS.
Statistic	Shane Drohan	Tanner Scott
G	1	3
GS	1	0
IP	1.0	3.0
W	0	0
SV	0	0
SO	1	6
BB	2	2
ERA	9.00	3.00
WHIP	3.00	1.00
K/9	9.0	18.0
BB/9	18.0	6.0

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Shane Drohan	Tanner Scott
G	2	12
GS	1	0
IP	1.0	11.0
W	0	0
SV	0	0
SO	1	18
BB	2	5
ERA	18.00	2.45
WHIP	7.00	0.91
K/9	9.0	14.7
BB/9	18.0	4.1

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Shane Drohan	Tanner Scott
G	33	69
GS	19	0
IP	124.2	63.2
W	7	1
SO	125	82
ERA	4.19	2.83
FIP	3.74	2.10
WHIP	1.32	1.01
K/9	9.0	11.6
BB/9	3.2	2.1
FIP−	89	50
WAR	1.9	1.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Shane Drohan	Tanner Scott
G	33	513
GS	19	0
IP	124.2	489.1
W	7	33
L	5	34
SV	2	103
SO	125	628
BB	44	235
ERA	4.19	3.60
WHIP	1.32	1.30
K/9	9.0	11.6
BB/9	3.2	4.3
HR/9	1.0	0.8
WAR	1.9	8.1

Shane Drohan’s full profile →Tanner Scott’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Shane Drohan vs

Tanner Scott vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.