DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 NLCS pitching

Logan Henderson vs Tanner Scott

In 2026 Logan Henderson has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLCS.
StatisticLogan HendersonTanner Scott
G13
GS10
IP4.03.0
W00
SV00
SO26
BB22
ERA4.503.00
WHIP1.251.00
K/94.518.0
BB/94.56.0
Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticLogan HendersonTanner Scott
G312
GS30
IP12.011.0
W00
SV00
SO1018
BB65
ERA4.502.45
WHIP1.170.91
K/97.514.7
BB/94.54.1

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticLogan HendersonTanner Scott
G1869
GS180
IP98.163.2
W111
SO11082
ERA2.472.83
FIP3.332.10
WHIP0.841.01
K/910.111.6
BB/91.72.1
FIP−8050
WAR2.21.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticLogan HendersonTanner Scott
G23513
GS230
IP123.2489.1
W1433
L334
SV0103
SO143628
BB27235
ERA2.333.60
WHIP0.871.30
K/910.411.6
BB/92.04.3
HR/91.20.8
WAR2.88.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.