DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Nathan Eovaldi vs Trevor Rogers

In 2026 Trevor Rogers has been worth 1.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticNathan EovaldiTrevor Rogers
G2730
GS2330
IP145.2169.2
W1110
SO144157
ERA4.204.03
FIP4.193.45
WHIP1.221.18
K/98.98.3
BB/92.22.1
FIP−10083
WAR1.53.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticNathan EovaldiTrevor Rogers
G171
GS120
IP79.21.2
W90
SV00
SO822
BB181
ERA3.0510.80
WHIP1.043.00
K/99.310.8
BB/92.05.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticNathan EovaldiTrevor Rogers
G343132
GS320132
IP1,848.0689.2
W11334
L9448
SV00
SO1,631678
BB501234
ERA3.923.88
WHIP1.251.27
K/97.98.8
BB/92.43.1
HR/91.00.9
WAR28.713.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.