Head to head · 2026 pitching

Trevor Rogers vs Cristopher Sánchez

So far in 2026 Cristopher Sánchez has been worth 2.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trevor Rogers BAL

Cristopher Sánchez PHI

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trevor Rogers	Cristopher Sánchez
G	29	31
GS	29	31
IP	165.2	193.2
W	10	17
SO	153	215
ERA	4.07	2.93
FIP	3.51	2.80
WHIP	1.18	1.22
K/9	8.3	10.0
BB/9	2.1	2.0
FIP−	84	67
WAR	3.2	5.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Trevor Rogers	Cristopher Sánchez
G	131	135
GS	131	116
IP	685.2	729.1
W	34	47
L	48	27
SV	0	1
SO	674	724
BB	234	172
ERA	3.89	3.16
WHIP	1.27	1.18
K/9	8.8	8.9
BB/9	3.1	2.1
HR/9	0.9	0.8
WAR	13.1	18.4

Trevor Rogers’s full profile →Cristopher Sánchez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trevor Rogers vs

Cristopher Sánchez vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.