DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Matthew Boyd vs Logan Webb

In 2026 Logan Webb has been worth 1.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMatthew BoydLogan Webb
G2227
GS2227
IP126.2160.2
W108
SO96134
ERA3.914.31
FIP4.223.46
WHIP1.211.17
K/96.87.5
BB/92.82.3
FIP−10183
WAR1.53.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticMatthew BoydLogan Webb
G82
GS72
IP25.214.2
W01
SV00
SO2717
BB131
ERA2.810.61
WHIP1.400.68
K/99.510.4
BB/94.60.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticMatthew BoydLogan Webb
G235207
GS221204
IP1,214.21,223.0
W7078
L8262
SV00
SO1,1411,128
BB375291
ERA4.503.50
WHIP1.271.19
K/98.58.3
BB/92.82.1
HR/91.40.6
WAR12.630.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.