DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Jacob deGrom vs David Peterson

In 2026 Jacob deGrom has been worth 2.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticJacob deGromDavid Peterson
G3132
GS3123
IP162.2148.1
W119
SO201137
ERA4.204.79
FIP3.123.97
WHIP1.141.50
K/911.18.3
BB/92.53.9
FIP−7595
WAR3.91.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticJacob deGromDavid Peterson
G58
GS51
IP31.016.0
W41
SV01
SO3711
BB108
ERA2.902.81
WHIP1.161.56
K/910.76.2
BB/92.94.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticJacob deGromDavid Peterson
G279163
GS279138
IP1,702.1771.0
W10746
L7638
SV01
SO2,052751
BB391327
ERA2.734.25
WHIP1.001.40
K/910.88.8
BB/92.13.8
HR/90.90.9
WAR47.210.7

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.