Head to head · 2024 batting

Jake Cave vs Andy Ibáñez

In 2024 the two have been worth the same 0.3 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jake Cave COL

Andy Ibáñez DET

2024 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Cave	Andy Ibáñez
G	111	99
PA	346	244
H	81	54
HR	7	5
RBI	37	32
SB	5	2
AVG	.251	.241
OBP	.290	.295
SLG	.396	.357
OPS	.686	.652
ISO	.146	.116
BB%	5.2%	6.1%
K%	28.3%	25.8%
wOBA	.297	.289
wRC+	85	84
WAR	0.3	0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jake Cave	Andy Ibáñez
G	479	426
PA	1,564	1,246
H	337	288
2B	67	59
3B	16	5
HR	45	28
RBI	176	133
BB	98	76
SO	481	217
SB	13	10
AVG	.236	.250
SLG	.400	.383
WAR	2.2	2.2

Jake Cave’s full profile →Andy Ibáñez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Cave vs

Andy Ibáñez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.