DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Austin Gomber vs Tanner Houck

In 2025 Tanner Houck has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticAustin GomberTanner Houck
G129
GS129
IP57.243.2
W00
SO3432
ERA7.498.04
FIP6.506.16
WHIP1.721.69
K/95.36.6
BB/92.73.5
FIP−156148
WAR-0.7-0.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticAustin GomberTanner Houck
G15
GS00
IP1.110.1
W01
SV00
SO210
BB10
ERA0.005.23
WHIP2.250.68
K/913.58.7
BB/96.80.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticAustin GomberTanner Houck
G168114
GS12481
IP705.2477.1
W3524
L4733
SV09
SO539450
BB220158
ERA5.084.00
WHIP1.391.24
K/96.98.5
BB/92.83.0
HR/91.50.8
WAR3.48.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.