DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Austin Gomber vs Gunnar Hoglund

In 2025 Gunnar Hoglund has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticAustin GomberGunnar Hoglund
G126
GS126
IP57.232.1
W01
SO3423
ERA7.496.40
FIP6.506.75
WHIP1.721.52
K/95.36.4
BB/92.73.1
FIP−156162
WAR-0.7-0.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticAustin GomberGunnar Hoglund
G1—
GS0—
IP1.1—
W0—
SV0—
SO2—
BB1—
ERA0.00—
WHIP2.25—
K/913.5—
BB/96.8—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticAustin GomberGunnar Hoglund
G1686
GS1246
IP705.232.1
W351
L473
SV00
SO53923
BB22011
ERA5.086.40
WHIP1.391.52
K/96.96.4
BB/92.83.1
HR/91.52.8
WAR3.4-0.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.