Head to head · 2026 batting

Ketel Marte vs George Springer

In 2026 Ketel Marte has been worth 1.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2025 by dbWAR.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Ketel Marte AZ

George Springer TOR

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ketel Marte	George Springer
G	141	125
PA	624	517
H	140	115
HR	22	15
RBI	76	54
SB	4	12
AVG	.249	.249
OBP	.316	.321
SLG	.432	.405
OPS	.748	.726
ISO	.183	.156
BB%	8.2%	9.1%
K%	13.8%	18.4%
wOBA	.325	.323
wRC+	105	103
WAR	2.6	0.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Ketel Marte	George Springer
G	21	83
PA	96	384
H	31	93
HR	3	23
RBI	13	48
BB	6	36
SO	23	91
SB	3	4
AVG	.344	.271
OBP	.385	.346
SLG	.589	.534
OPS	.974	.880

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Ketel Marte	George Springer
G	1,363	1,564
PA	5,716	6,892
H	1,413	1,595
2B	301	272
3B	46	25
HR	193	308
RBI	663	850
BB	522	723
SO	895	1,410
SB	69	132
AVG	.277	.265
SLG	.468	.472
WAR	38.0	37.8

Ketel Marte’s full profile →George Springer’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ketel Marte vs

George Springer vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.