Head to head · 2026 batting

José Ramírez vs Trea Turner

In 2026 Trea Turner has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2025 by dbWAR.
Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

José Ramírez CLE

Trea Turner PHI

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	José Ramírez	Trea Turner
G	124	157
PA	544	700
H	111	156
HR	12	19
RBI	53	58
SB	37	21
AVG	.235	.242
OBP	.320	.297
SLG	.368	.378
OPS	.688	.675
ISO	.133	.136
BB%	11.0%	6.9%
K%	12.7%	21.0%
wOBA	.303	.299
wRC+	89	83
WAR	1.8	2.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	José Ramírez	Trea Turner
G	56	67
PA	238	301
H	52	69
HR	6	6
RBI	27	17
BB	27	19
SO	39	70
SB	5	14
AVG	.250	.249
OBP	.336	.299
SLG	.399	.368
OPS	.735	.667

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	José Ramírez	Trea Turner
G	1,715	1,416
PA	7,303	6,306
H	1,779	1,687
2B	425	311
3B	43	49
HR	297	205
RBI	1,002	699
BB	726	431
SO	871	1,175
SB	324	336
AVG	.276	.291
SLG	.494	.467
WAR	55.3	49.6

José Ramírez’s full profile →Trea Turner’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

José Ramírez vs

Trea Turner vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.