DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Michael Wacha vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto

In 2026 Yoshinobu Yamamoto has been worth 1.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMichael WachaYoshinobu Yamamoto
G3228
GS3228
IP200.2185.0
W914
SO158182
ERA3.322.53
FIP4.383.34
WHIP1.110.87
K/97.18.9
BB/92.42.0
FIP−10580
WAR2.24.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticMichael WachaYoshinobu Yamamoto
G1012
GS811
IP46.265.2
W48
SV00
SO4759
BB2015
ERA5.212.47
WHIP1.350.88
K/99.18.1
BB/93.92.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticMichael WachaYoshinobu Yamamoto
G34176
GS32076
IP1,828.0448.2
W12033
L8519
SV00
SO1,574488
BB557123
ERA3.832.61
WHIP1.260.97
K/97.79.8
BB/92.72.5
HR/91.10.8
WAR24.311.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.