Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Alonso vs Kyle Stowers

So far in 2026 Pete Alonso has been worth 2.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Alonso BAL

Kyle Stowers MIA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Alonso	Kyle Stowers
G	155	117
PA	674	497
H	154	103
HR	38	19
RBI	105	61
SB	5	1
AVG	.266	.237
OBP	.361	.327
SLG	.503	.446
OPS	.864	.773
ISO	.238	.209
BB%	11.6%	10.1%
K%	24.2%	32.0%
wOBA	.374	.336
wRC+	142	115
WAR	4.3	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Alonso	Kyle Stowers
G	1,162	339
PA	4,990	1,294
H	1,105	283
2B	207	62
3B	8	10
HR	302	50
RBI	817	169
BB	497	119
SO	1,147	399
SB	23	6
AVG	.254	.247
SLG	.514	.449
WAR	27.8	4.8

Pete Alonso’s full profile →Kyle Stowers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Alonso vs

Kyle Stowers vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.