Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Alonso vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Alonso BAL

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Alonso	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	161	162
PA	700	726
H	161	175
HR	43	45
RBI	113	107
SB	5	41
AVG	.267	.280
OBP	.363	.372
SLG	.522	.570
OPS	.884	.943
ISO	.254	.291
BB%	11.6%	11.4%
K%	24.1%	25.8%
wOBA	.381	.402
wRC+	148	157
WAR	4.9	8.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Alonso	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	1,168	448
PA	5,016	1,802
H	1,112	409
2B	207	81
3B	8	18
HR	307	86
RBI	825	250
BB	500	136
SO	1,153	447
SB	23	105
AVG	.255	.255
SLG	.517	.489
WAR	28.5	13.6

Pete Alonso’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Alonso vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.