Head to head · 2026 pitching
Raisel Iglesias vs Luke Weaver
In 2026 Luke Weaver has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Raisel Iglesias | Luke Weaver |
|---|---|---|
| G | 59 | 60 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 60.0 | 60.1 |
| W | 1 | 4 |
| SO | 64 | 65 |
| ERA | 2.55 | 2.69 |
| FIP | 3.17 | 2.97 |
| WHIP | 1.08 | 0.96 |
| K/9 | 9.6 | 9.7 |
| BB/9 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| FIP− | 76 | 71 |
| WAR | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Raisel Iglesias | Luke Weaver |
|---|---|---|
| G | 12 | 15 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 9.2 | 15.2 |
| W | 0 | 1 |
| SV | 3 | 4 |
| SO | 10 | 16 |
| BB | 5 | 4 |
| ERA | 4.66 | 4.60 |
| WHIP | 1.45 | 1.02 |
| K/9 | 9.3 | 9.2 |
| BB/9 | 4.7 | 2.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Raisel Iglesias | Luke Weaver |
|---|---|---|
| G | 659 | 330 |
| GS | 21 | 106 |
| IP | 796.0 | 783.1 |
| W | 43 | 42 |
| L | 57 | 50 |
| SV | 287 | 13 |
| SO | 933 | 811 |
| BB | 219 | 250 |
| ERA | 2.87 | 4.58 |
| WHIP | 1.05 | 1.31 |
| K/9 | 10.5 | 9.3 |
| BB/9 | 2.5 | 2.9 |
| HR/9 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| WAR | 14.8 | 9.1 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.