DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

David Bednar vs Luke Weaver

In 2026 David Bednar has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticDavid BednarLuke Weaver
G6460
GS00
IP69.160.1
W74
SO7665
ERA2.472.69
FIP2.612.97
WHIP1.040.96
K/99.99.7
BB/92.62.4
FIP−6271
WAR1.71.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticDavid BednarLuke Weaver
G815
GS00
IP9.015.2
W01
SV24
SO1216
BB24
ERA1.004.60
WHIP0.671.02
K/912.09.2
BB/92.02.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticDavid BednarLuke Weaver
G379330
GS0106
IP386.2783.1
W2542
L2650
SV14613
SO465811
BB130250
ERA3.034.58
WHIP1.131.31
K/910.89.3
BB/93.02.9
HR/90.81.3
WAR8.09.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.