DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Pablo López vs Parker Messick

In 2025 Pablo López has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticPablo LópezParker Messick
G147
GS147
IP75.239.2
W53
SO7338
ERA2.742.72
FIP3.192.98
WHIP1.111.31
K/98.78.6
BB/92.41.4
FIP−7772
WAR1.81.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticPablo LópezParker Messick
G34
GS34
IP17.213.2
W20
SV00
SO1717
BB310
ERA1.533.95
WHIP0.961.98
K/98.711.2
BB/91.56.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticPablo LópezParker Messick
G17239
GS17239
IP965.0226.0
W5915
L5310
SV00
SO994231
BB25155
ERA3.812.59
WHIP1.181.11
K/99.39.2
BB/92.32.2
HR/91.10.8
WAR18.55.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.