Head to head · 2025 batting
Tim Anderson vs Curtis Mead
In 2025 the two have been worth the same -0.3 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
| Statistic | Tim Anderson | Curtis Mead |
|---|---|---|
| G | 28 | 88 |
| PA | 90 | 264 |
| H | 17 | 56 |
| HR | 0 | 3 |
| RBI | 3 | 19 |
| SB | 1 | 5 |
| AVG | .205 | .233 |
| OBP | .258 | .299 |
| SLG | .241 | .321 |
| OPS | .499 | .620 |
| ISO | .036 | .087 |
| BB% | 3.3% | 5.7% |
| K% | 32.2% | 23.9% |
| wOBA | .231 | .281 |
| wRC+ | 41 | 75 |
| WAR | -0.3 | -0.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Tim Anderson | Curtis Mead |
|---|---|---|
| G | 985 | 238 |
| PA | 4,139 | 817 |
| H | 1,088 | 178 |
| 2B | 185 | 33 |
| 3B | 18 | 3 |
| HR | 98 | 22 |
| RBI | 350 | 79 |
| BB | 153 | 67 |
| SO | 980 | 177 |
| SB | 122 | 13 |
| AVG | .276 | .244 |
| SLG | .407 | .388 |
| WAR | 15.5 | 2.1 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.