Head to head · 2026 batting

Curtis Mead vs Brayan Rocchio

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same 2.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Curtis Mead WSH

Brayan Rocchio CLE

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Curtis Mead	Brayan Rocchio
G	88	148
PA	329	572
H	72	129
HR	17	13
RBI	48	70
SB	6	20
AVG	.253	.250
OBP	.353	.312
SLG	.498	.381
OPS	.851	.693
ISO	.246	.130
BB%	11.9%	6.5%
K%	19.1%	14.3%
wOBA	.372	.309
wRC+	132	92
WAR	2.4	2.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Curtis Mead	Brayan Rocchio
G	238	413
PA	817	1,483
H	178	308
2B	33	66
3B	3	4
HR	22	26
RBI	79	158
BB	67	107
SO	177	276
SB	13	38
AVG	.244	.233
SLG	.388	.348
WAR	2.1	3.2

Curtis Mead’s full profile →Brayan Rocchio’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Curtis Mead vs

Brayan Rocchio vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.