Head to head · 2026 batting

Andrew Benintendi vs TJ Friedl

So far in 2026 Andrew Benintendi has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Andrew Benintendi CWS

TJ Friedl CIN

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Andrew Benintendi	TJ Friedl
G	135	81
PA	450	272
H	100	41
HR	14	4
RBI	71	13
SB	1	5
AVG	.246	.172
OBP	.305	.255
SLG	.418	.255
OPS	.723	.510
ISO	.172	.084
BB%	8.0%	8.1%
K%	23.3%	23.2%
wOBA	.316	.239
wRC+	99	46
WAR	0.4	-0.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Andrew Benintendi	TJ Friedl
G	1,276	539
PA	5,226	2,148
H	1,235	458
2B	263	66
3B	24	17
HR	132	58
RBI	627	214
BB	478	200
SO	946	362
SB	87	60
AVG	.265	.246
SLG	.417	.394
WAR	15.2	10.0

Andrew Benintendi’s full profile →TJ Friedl’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Andrew Benintendi vs

TJ Friedl vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.