Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Yandy Díaz vs Trent Grisham
In 2026 Yandy Díaz has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Yandy Díaz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 13 | 11 |
| H | 3 | 0 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 3 | 5 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .250 | .000 |
| OBP | .308 | .000 |
| SLG | .250 | .000 |
| OPS | .558 | .000 |
| Statistic | Yandy Díaz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 40 | 31 |
| PA | 160 | 125 |
| H | 30 | 17 |
| HR | 4 | 3 |
| RBI | 10 | 7 |
| BB | 15 | 13 |
| SO | 36 | 43 |
| SB | 0 | 2 |
| AVG | .208 | .156 |
| OBP | .287 | .264 |
| SLG | .347 | .266 |
| OPS | .635 | .530 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Yandy Díaz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 154 | 120 |
| PA | 686 | 484 |
| H | 180 | 88 |
| HR | 22 | 18 |
| RBI | 85 | 59 |
| SB | 3 | 9 |
| AVG | .293 | .211 |
| OBP | .359 | .308 |
| SLG | .446 | .395 |
| OPS | .805 | .703 |
| ISO | .153 | .184 |
| BB% | 8.2% | 12.6% |
| K% | 14.3% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .352 | .314 |
| wRC+ | 123 | 93 |
| WAR | 2.5 | 1.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Yandy Díaz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1,052 | 861 |
| PA | 4,441 | 3,315 |
| H | 1,137 | 616 |
| 2B | 210 | 125 |
| 3B | 8 | 14 |
| HR | 122 | 122 |
| RBI | 509 | 379 |
| BB | 465 | 402 |
| SO | 656 | 818 |
| SB | 14 | 59 |
| AVG | .291 | .217 |
| SLG | .442 | .399 |
| WAR | 22.8 | 13.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

