Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Trent Grisham

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 7.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 6 most valuable center fielders of 2025 by dbWAR.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Trent Grisham NYY

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Trent Grisham
G	162	120
PA	726	484
H	175	88
HR	45	18
RBI	107	59
SB	41	9
AVG	.280	.211
OBP	.372	.308
SLG	.570	.395
OPS	.943	.703
ISO	.291	.184
BB%	11.4%	12.6%
K%	25.8%	18.4%
wOBA	.402	.314
wRC+	157	93
WAR	8.7	1.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Trent Grisham
G	10	31
PA	37	125
H	5	17
HR	0	3
RBI	3	7
BB	2	13
SO	16	43
SB	2	2
AVG	.147	.156
OBP	.194	.264
SLG	.147	.266
OPS	.342	.530

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Trent Grisham
G	448	861
PA	1,802	3,315
H	409	616
2B	81	125
3B	18	14
HR	86	122
RBI	250	379
BB	136	402
SO	447	818
SB	105	59
AVG	.255	.217
SLG	.489	.399
WAR	13.6	13.9

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Trent Grisham’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Trent Grisham vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.