Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Junior Caminero vs Trent Grisham
In 2026 Junior Caminero has been worth 4.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Junior Caminero | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 12 | 11 |
| H | 3 | 0 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 2 | 0 |
| SO | 2 | 5 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .300 | .000 |
| OBP | .417 | .000 |
| SLG | .400 | .000 |
| OPS | .817 | .000 |
| Statistic | Junior Caminero | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 16 | 31 |
| PA | 59 | 125 |
| H | 13 | 17 |
| HR | 1 | 3 |
| RBI | 5 | 7 |
| BB | 5 | 13 |
| SO | 17 | 43 |
| SB | 0 | 2 |
| AVG | .241 | .156 |
| OBP | .305 | .264 |
| SLG | .370 | .266 |
| OPS | .675 | .530 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Junior Caminero | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 162 | 120 |
| PA | 702 | 484 |
| H | 170 | 88 |
| HR | 42 | 18 |
| RBI | 101 | 59 |
| SB | 3 | 9 |
| AVG | .276 | .211 |
| OBP | .360 | .308 |
| SLG | .524 | .395 |
| OPS | .885 | .703 |
| ISO | .248 | .184 |
| BB% | 11.3% | 12.6% |
| K% | 18.4% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .377 | .314 |
| wRC+ | 140 | 93 |
| WAR | 5.7 | 1.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Junior Caminero | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 366 | 861 |
| PA | 1,568 | 3,315 |
| H | 378 | 616 |
| 2B | 63 | 125 |
| 3B | 2 | 14 |
| HR | 94 | 122 |
| RBI | 236 | 379 |
| BB | 133 | 402 |
| SO | 300 | 818 |
| SB | 12 | 59 |
| AVG | .267 | .217 |
| SLG | .513 | .399 |
| WAR | 10.5 | 13.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

