Head to head · 2026 pitching
Michael King vs Peter Lambert
In 2026 Peter Lambert has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Michael King | Peter Lambert |
|---|---|---|
| G | 32 | 29 |
| GS | 32 | 29 |
| IP | 185.0 | 155.2 |
| W | 12 | 8 |
| SO | 159 | 154 |
| ERA | 3.21 | 3.82 |
| FIP | 4.14 | 3.91 |
| WHIP | 1.18 | 1.25 |
| K/9 | 7.7 | 8.9 |
| BB/9 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| FIP− | 99 | 94 |
| WAR | 2.2 | 2.3 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Michael King | Peter Lambert |
|---|---|---|
| G | 7 | 1 |
| GS | 4 | 0 |
| IP | 29.0 | 3.0 |
| W | 3 | 0 |
| SV | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 34 | 2 |
| BB | 6 | 2 |
| ERA | 1.86 | 6.00 |
| WHIP | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| K/9 | 10.6 | 6.0 |
| BB/9 | 1.9 | 6.0 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Michael King | Peter Lambert |
|---|---|---|
| G | 193 | 103 |
| GS | 96 | 64 |
| IP | 679.2 | 399.1 |
| W | 43 | 16 |
| L | 39 | 29 |
| SV | 7 | 0 |
| SO | 718 | 335 |
| BB | 242 | 154 |
| ERA | 3.23 | 5.32 |
| WHIP | 1.19 | 1.47 |
| K/9 | 9.5 | 7.6 |
| BB/9 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
| HR/9 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| WAR | 10.8 | 2.1 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.