Head to head · 2025 pitching

Michael King vs Ryan Pepiot

In 2025 Ryan Pepiot has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Michael King SD

Ryan Pepiot TB

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Michael King	Ryan Pepiot
G	15	31
GS	15	31
IP	73.1	167.2
W	5	11
SO	76	167
ERA	3.44	3.86
FIP	4.42	4.36
WHIP	1.20	1.16
K/9	9.3	9.0
BB/9	3.2	3.3
FIP−	106	105
WAR	0.6	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Michael King	Ryan Pepiot
G	192	74
GS	95	67
IP	675.2	376.0
W	43	24
L	38	21
SV	7	0
SO	713	389
BB	240	141
ERA	3.18	3.54
WHIP	1.18	1.14
K/9	9.5	9.3
BB/9	3.2	3.4
HR/9	1.0	1.3
WAR	10.7	3.6

Michael King’s full profile →Ryan Pepiot’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Michael King vs

Ryan Pepiot vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.