Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Shohei Ohtani vs Matt Olson
In 2026 Shohei Ohtani has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Shohei Ohtani | Matt Olson |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 16 | 17 |
| H | 2 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 2 | 1 |
| SO | 4 | 6 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .154 | .125 |
| OBP | .267 | .176 |
| SLG | .154 | .125 |
| OPS | .421 | .301 |
| Statistic | Shohei Ohtani | Matt Olson |
|---|---|---|
| G | 41 | 26 |
| PA | 192 | 108 |
| H | 37 | 17 |
| HR | 12 | 5 |
| RBI | 27 | 11 |
| BB | 33 | 16 |
| SO | 55 | 27 |
| SB | 2 | 0 |
| AVG | .239 | .187 |
| OBP | .379 | .306 |
| SLG | .510 | .352 |
| OPS | .889 | .657 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Shohei Ohtani | Matt Olson |
|---|---|---|
| G | 135 | 162 |
| PA | 618 | 698 |
| H | 144 | 157 |
| HR | 30 | 41 |
| RBI | 81 | 93 |
| SB | 11 | 4 |
| AVG | .275 | .251 |
| OBP | .377 | .321 |
| SLG | .512 | .502 |
| OPS | .889 | .823 |
| ISO | .237 | .251 |
| BB% | 13.1% | 9.2% |
| K% | 24.6% | 24.5% |
| wOBA | .379 | .352 |
| wRC+ | 143 | 121 |
| WAR | 3.8 | 3.1 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Shohei Ohtani | Matt Olson |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1,153 | 1,381 |
| PA | 4,947 | 5,895 |
| H | 1,194 | 1,312 |
| 2B | 218 | 284 |
| 3B | 49 | 7 |
| HR | 310 | 329 |
| RBI | 750 | 901 |
| BB | 622 | 677 |
| SO | 1,256 | 1,409 |
| SB | 176 | 13 |
| AVG | .281 | .256 |
| SLG | .574 | .507 |
| WAR | 41.9 | 33.0 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

