Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Ronald Acuña Jr. vs Shohei Ohtani
In 2026 Shohei Ohtani has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Ronald Acuña Jr. | Shohei Ohtani |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 17 | 16 |
| H | 2 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 2 | 2 |
| SO | 4 | 4 |
| SB | 1 | 1 |
| AVG | .133 | .154 |
| OBP | .235 | .267 |
| SLG | .133 | .154 |
| OPS | .369 | .421 |
| Statistic | Ronald Acuña Jr. | Shohei Ohtani |
|---|---|---|
| G | 36 | 41 |
| PA | 158 | 192 |
| H | 31 | 37 |
| HR | 3 | 12 |
| RBI | 9 | 27 |
| BB | 20 | 33 |
| SO | 40 | 55 |
| SB | 8 | 2 |
| AVG | .233 | .239 |
| OBP | .354 | .379 |
| SLG | .391 | .510 |
| OPS | .745 | .889 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Ronald Acuña Jr. | Shohei Ohtani |
|---|---|---|
| G | 107 | 135 |
| PA | 469 | 618 |
| H | 104 | 144 |
| HR | 20 | 30 |
| RBI | 55 | 81 |
| SB | 21 | 11 |
| AVG | .255 | .275 |
| OBP | .345 | .377 |
| SLG | .451 | .512 |
| OPS | .796 | .889 |
| ISO | .196 | .237 |
| BB% | 11.3% | 13.1% |
| K% | 22.0% | 24.6% |
| wOBA | .350 | .379 |
| wRC+ | 120 | 143 |
| WAR | 2.3 | 3.8 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Ronald Acuña Jr. | Shohei Ohtani |
|---|---|---|
| G | 924 | 1,153 |
| PA | 4,135 | 4,947 |
| H | 1,017 | 1,194 |
| 2B | 175 | 218 |
| 3B | 14 | 49 |
| HR | 206 | 310 |
| RBI | 514 | 750 |
| BB | 492 | 622 |
| SO | 924 | 1,256 |
| SB | 226 | 176 |
| AVG | .285 | .281 |
| SLG | .516 | .574 |
| WAR | 34.4 | 41.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.