Head to head · 2026 batting
Nick Fortes vs Nathan Lukes
In 2026 Nick Fortes has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Nick Fortes | Nathan Lukes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 101 | 123 |
| PA | 323 | 450 |
| H | 77 | 113 |
| HR | 6 | 10 |
| RBI | 35 | 41 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .258 | .277 |
| OBP | .304 | .327 |
| SLG | .376 | .387 |
| OPS | .680 | .715 |
| ISO | .117 | .110 |
| BB% | 3.7% | 5.6% |
| K% | 13.9% | 14.2% |
| wOBA | .302 | .318 |
| wRC+ | 88 | 100 |
| WAR | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Nick Fortes | Nathan Lukes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 17 |
| PA | 7 | 68 |
| H | 0 | 17 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 8 |
| BB | 0 | 5 |
| SO | 1 | 10 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .000 | .274 |
| OBP | .000 | .328 |
| SLG | .000 | .339 |
| OPS | .000 | .667 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Nick Fortes | Nathan Lukes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 473 | 294 |
| PA | 1,497 | 1,010 |
| H | 316 | 240 |
| 2B | 58 | 39 |
| 3B | 2 | 5 |
| HR | 34 | 23 |
| RBI | 142 | 118 |
| BB | 75 | 77 |
| SO | 245 | 142 |
| SB | 11 | 4 |
| AVG | .231 | .267 |
| SLG | .351 | .399 |
| WAR | 2.2 | 2.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

