Head to head · 2026 batting

Nathan Lukes vs Jeff McNeil

So far in 2026 Nathan Lukes has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Nathan Lukes TOR

Jeff McNeil ATH

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nathan Lukes	Jeff McNeil
G	117	137
PA	424	496
H	105	121
HR	10	8
RBI	37	54
SB	1	8
AVG	.271	.265
OBP	.319	.312
SLG	.385	.365
OPS	.704	.677
ISO	.114	.101
BB%	5.2%	5.6%
K%	14.9%	11.3%
wOBA	.313	.301
wRC+	96	79
WAR	0.8	0.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Nathan Lukes	Jeff McNeil
G	288	1,050
PA	984	4,117
H	232	1,041
2B	38	215
3B	5	18
HR	23	88
RBI	114	421
BB	74	289
SO	141	486
SB	4	45
AVG	.265	.281
SLG	.398	.420
WAR	2.3	21.7

Nathan Lukes’s full profile →Jeff McNeil’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nathan Lukes vs

Jeff McNeil vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.