Head to head · 2026 batting
Nathan Lukes vs Jeff McNeil
In 2026 Nathan Lukes has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Nathan Lukes | Jeff McNeil |
|---|---|---|
| G | 123 | 144 |
| PA | 450 | 520 |
| H | 113 | 126 |
| HR | 10 | 9 |
| RBI | 41 | 59 |
| SB | 1 | 8 |
| AVG | .277 | .264 |
| OBP | .327 | .313 |
| SLG | .387 | .368 |
| OPS | .715 | .681 |
| ISO | .110 | .105 |
| BB% | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| K% | 14.2% | 11.3% |
| wOBA | .318 | .303 |
| wRC+ | 100 | 79 |
| WAR | 1.0 | 0.6 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Nathan Lukes | Jeff McNeil |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | 8 |
| PA | 68 | 24 |
| H | 17 | 4 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 8 | 5 |
| BB | 5 | 0 |
| SO | 10 | 2 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .274 | .182 |
| OBP | .328 | .167 |
| SLG | .339 | .227 |
| OPS | .667 | .394 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Nathan Lukes | Jeff McNeil |
|---|---|---|
| G | 294 | 1,057 |
| PA | 1,010 | 4,141 |
| H | 240 | 1,046 |
| 2B | 39 | 216 |
| 3B | 5 | 18 |
| HR | 23 | 89 |
| RBI | 118 | 426 |
| BB | 77 | 292 |
| SO | 142 | 489 |
| SB | 4 | 45 |
| AVG | .267 | .281 |
| SLG | .399 | .420 |
| WAR | 2.6 | 21.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

