Head to head · 2026 batting

Jeff McNeil vs Miguel Rojas

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jeff McNeil ATH

Miguel Rojas LAD

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jeff McNeil	Miguel Rojas
G	144	101
PA	520	252
H	126	60
HR	9	4
RBI	59	23
SB	8	1
AVG	.264	.267
OBP	.313	.312
SLG	.368	.391
OPS	.681	.703
ISO	.105	.124
BB%	6.0%	6.3%
K%	11.3%	10.7%
wOBA	.303	.308
wRC+	79	93
WAR	0.6	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jeff McNeil	Miguel Rojas
G	1,057	1,249
PA	4,141	4,249
H	1,046	1,021
2B	216	207
3B	18	11
HR	89	60
RBI	426	377
BB	292	273
SO	489	514
SB	45	68
AVG	.281	.263
SLG	.420	.369
WAR	21.8	11.5

Jeff McNeil’s full profile →Miguel Rojas’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jeff McNeil vs

Miguel Rojas vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.