Head to head · 2026 batting

Nathan Lukes vs Miguel Rojas

In 2026 Nathan Lukes has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Nathan Lukes TOR

Miguel Rojas LAD

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nathan Lukes	Miguel Rojas
G	123	101
PA	450	252
H	113	60
HR	10	4
RBI	41	23
SB	1	1
AVG	.277	.267
OBP	.327	.312
SLG	.387	.391
OPS	.715	.703
ISO	.110	.124
BB%	5.6%	6.3%
K%	14.2%	10.7%
wOBA	.318	.308
wRC+	100	93
WAR	1.0	0.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Nathan Lukes	Miguel Rojas
G	17	24
PA	68	65
H	17	14
HR	0	2
RBI	8	3
BB	5	2
SO	10	8
SB	0	0
AVG	.274	.233
OBP	.328	.281
SLG	.339	.350
OPS	.667	.631

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Nathan Lukes	Miguel Rojas
G	294	1,314
PA	1,010	4,411
H	240	1,048
2B	39	210
3B	5	11
HR	23	61
RBI	118	386
BB	77	283
SO	142	542
SB	4	68
AVG	.267	.260
SLG	.399	.363
WAR	2.6	10.9

Nathan Lukes’s full profile →Miguel Rojas’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nathan Lukes vs

Miguel Rojas vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.