Head to head · 2026 batting

Trent Grisham vs Gunnar Henderson

So far in 2026 Gunnar Henderson has been worth 1.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Grisham NYY

Gunnar Henderson BAL

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Gunnar Henderson
G	120	153
PA	484	682
H	88	136
HR	18	23
RBI	59	58
SB	9	10
AVG	.211	.224
OBP	.308	.308
SLG	.395	.399
OPS	.703	.707
ISO	.184	.175
BB%	12.6%	9.5%
K%	18.4%	21.8%
wOBA	.314	.313
wRC+	93	99
WAR	1.6	2.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Gunnar Henderson
G	861	650
PA	3,315	2,806
H	616	644
2B	125	128
3B	14	27
HR	122	109
RBI	379	318
BB	402	277
SO	818	638
SB	59	72
AVG	.217	.259
SLG	.399	.463
WAR	13.9	21.6

Trent Grisham’s full profile →Gunnar Henderson’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Grisham vs

Gunnar Henderson vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.