Head to head · 2026 batting

Nathaniel Lowe vs Ryan O'Hearn

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Nathaniel Lowe CIN

Ryan O'Hearn PIT

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nathaniel Lowe	Ryan O'Hearn
G	123	110
PA	429	451
H	96	108
HR	17	18
RBI	64	76
SB	0	1
AVG	.252	.265
OBP	.317	.330
SLG	.444	.440
OPS	.761	.770
ISO	.192	.174
BB%	8.9%	7.8%
K%	23.1%	22.0%
wOBA	.330	.338
wRC+	111	109
WAR	1.2	1.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Nathaniel Lowe	Ryan O'Hearn
G	960	843
PA	3,859	2,928
H	892	668
2B	159	121
3B	13	10
HR	124	102
RBI	477	389
BB	414	252
SO	935	646
SB	15	12
AVG	.262	.254
SLG	.426	.424
WAR	14.0	6.4

Nathaniel Lowe’s full profile →Ryan O'Hearn’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nathaniel Lowe vs

Ryan O'Hearn vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.