Head to head · 2026 batting

Paul Goldschmidt vs Nathaniel Lowe

In 2026 Nathaniel Lowe has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Paul Goldschmidt NYY

Nathaniel Lowe CIN

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Nathaniel Lowe
G	104	123
PA	380	429
H	87	96
HR	18	17
RBI	52	64
SB	1	0
AVG	.252	.252
OBP	.313	.317
SLG	.452	.444
OPS	.765	.761
ISO	.200	.192
BB%	7.6%	8.9%
K%	22.6%	23.1%
wOBA	.332	.330
wRC+	105	111
WAR	0.9	1.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Nathaniel Lowe
G	32	32
PA	121	125
H	28	24
HR	8	3
RBI	16	11
BB	11	12
SO	28	34
SB	1	0
AVG	.262	.212
OBP	.347	.288
SLG	.533	.327
OPS	.880	.615

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Nathaniel Lowe
G	2,169	960
PA	9,206	3,859
H	2,277	892
2B	490	159
3B	25	13
HR	390	124
RBI	1,284	477
BB	1,115	414
SO	2,065	935
SB	175	15
AVG	.286	.262
SLG	.501	.426
WAR	59.7	14.0

Paul Goldschmidt’s full profile →Nathaniel Lowe’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Paul Goldschmidt vs

Nathaniel Lowe vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.