Head to head · 2026 batting

Paul Goldschmidt vs Nathaniel Lowe

In 2026 Nathaniel Lowe has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Paul Goldschmidt NYY

Nathaniel Lowe CIN

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Nathaniel Lowe
G	104	123
PA	380	429
H	87	96
HR	18	17
RBI	52	64
SB	1	0
AVG	.252	.252
OBP	.313	.317
SLG	.452	.444
OPS	.765	.761
ISO	.200	.192
BB%	7.6%	8.9%
K%	22.6%	23.1%
wOBA	.332	.330
wRC+	105	111
WAR	0.9	1.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Nathaniel Lowe
G	1,707	960
PA	7,253	3,859
H	1,787	892
2B	363	159
3B	19	13
HR	307	124
RBI	982	477
BB	872	414
SO	1,627	935
SB	129	15
AVG	.285	.262
SLG	.495	.426
WAR	45.4	14.0

Paul Goldschmidt’s full profile →Nathaniel Lowe’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Paul Goldschmidt vs

Nathaniel Lowe vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.