Head to head · 2026 batting

Jeremy Peña vs Kyle Schwarber

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same 3.5 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jeremy Peña HOU

Kyle Schwarber PHI

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jeremy Peña	Kyle Schwarber
G	104	149
PA	451	669
H	115	131
HR	20	45
RBI	51	95
SB	9	3
AVG	.276	.235
OBP	.326	.352
SLG	.475	.513
OPS	.801	.864
ISO	.199	.278
BB%	5.3%	14.5%
K%	23.7%	32.3%
wOBA	.348	.372
wRC+	123	131
WAR	3.5	3.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jeremy Peña	Kyle Schwarber
G	671	1,439
PA	2,836	6,053
H	709	1,181
2B	129	193
3B	11	15
HR	84	385
RBI	298	879
BB	149	861
SO	575	1,743
SB	73	40
AVG	.272	.231
SLG	.426	.502
WAR	17.5	33.2

Jeremy Peña’s full profile →Kyle Schwarber’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jeremy Peña vs

Kyle Schwarber vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.