Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting
Jeremy Peña vs Tristan Peters
In 2026 Jeremy Peña has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2 | 2 |
| PA | 8 | 9 |
| H | 3 | 2 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 1 | 1 |
| BB | 0 | 1 |
| SO | 2 | 2 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .375 | .286 |
| OBP | .375 | .375 |
| SLG | .750 | .286 |
| OPS | 1.125 | .661 |
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 28 | 7 |
| PA | 119 | 24 |
| H | 32 | 6 |
| HR | 5 | 0 |
| RBI | 10 | 2 |
| BB | 4 | 2 |
| SO | 26 | 8 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .286 | .286 |
| OBP | .316 | .348 |
| SLG | .473 | .333 |
| OPS | .789 | .681 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 111 | 150 |
| PA | 483 | 491 |
| H | 124 | 116 |
| HR | 22 | 12 |
| RBI | 56 | 56 |
| SB | 12 | 8 |
| AVG | .277 | .265 |
| OBP | .325 | .337 |
| SLG | .477 | .437 |
| OPS | .802 | .774 |
| ISO | .199 | .172 |
| BB% | 5.0% | 7.5% |
| K% | 24.0% | 18.3% |
| wOBA | .348 | .342 |
| wRC+ | 123 | 118 |
| WAR | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 678 | 154 |
| PA | 2,868 | 503 |
| H | 718 | 116 |
| 2B | 129 | 31 |
| 3B | 11 | 4 |
| HR | 86 | 12 |
| RBI | 303 | 56 |
| BB | 149 | 37 |
| SO | 584 | 97 |
| SB | 76 | 8 |
| AVG | .272 | .258 |
| SLG | .427 | .425 |
| WAR | 17.7 | 2.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

