Head to head · 2026 batting

Xavier Edwards vs Luke Keaschall

In 2026 Luke Keaschall has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Xavier Edwards MIA

Luke Keaschall MIN

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Xavier Edwards	Luke Keaschall
G	140	152
PA	595	620
H	145	149
HR	6	10
RBI	52	52
SB	21	20
AVG	.280	.282
OBP	.360	.374
SLG	.371	.407
OPS	.730	.781
ISO	.091	.125
BB%	11.4%	9.5%
K%	13.9%	14.0%
wOBA	.329	.351
wRC+	110	125
WAR	3.2	3.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Xavier Edwards	Luke Keaschall
G	376	201
PA	1,601	827
H	414	204
2B	52	42
3B	16	4
HR	10	14
RBI	124	80
BB	153	78
SO	237	116
SB	84	34
AVG	.291	.287
SLG	.371	.417
WAR	9.7	5.7

Xavier Edwards’s full profile →Luke Keaschall’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Xavier Edwards vs

Luke Keaschall vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.