Head to head · 2026 batting

Luke Keaschall vs Otto Lopez

In 2026 Otto Lopez has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Luke Keaschall MIN

Otto Lopez MIA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Otto Lopez
G	152	157
PA	620	687
H	149	191
HR	10	11
RBI	52	71
SB	20	34
AVG	.282	.305
OBP	.374	.349
SLG	.407	.437
OPS	.781	.786
ISO	.125	.132
BB%	9.5%	5.8%
K%	14.0%	13.0%
wOBA	.351	.345
wRC+	125	121
WAR	3.9	5.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Otto Lopez
G	201	417
PA	827	1,726
H	204	440
2B	42	76
3B	4	10
HR	14	32
RBI	80	190
BB	78	110
SO	116	248
SB	34	69
AVG	.287	.278
SLG	.417	.399
WAR	5.7	8.9

Luke Keaschall’s full profile →Otto Lopez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luke Keaschall vs

Otto Lopez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.