Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Otto Lopez

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Otto Lopez MIA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Otto Lopez
G	162	157
PA	726	687
H	175	191
HR	45	11
RBI	107	71
SB	41	34
AVG	.280	.305
OBP	.372	.349
SLG	.570	.437
OPS	.943	.786
ISO	.291	.132
BB%	11.4%	5.8%
K%	25.8%	13.0%
wOBA	.402	.345
wRC+	157	121
WAR	8.7	5.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Otto Lopez
G	448	417
PA	1,802	1,726
H	409	440
2B	81	76
3B	18	10
HR	86	32
RBI	250	190
BB	136	110
SO	447	248
SB	105	69
AVG	.255	.278
SLG	.489	.399
WAR	13.6	8.9

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Otto Lopez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Otto Lopez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.