DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Trevor Rogers vs Bryan Woo

In 2026 Bryan Woo has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticTrevor RogersBryan Woo
G3030
GS3030
IP169.2173.0
W1012
SO157175
ERA4.034.01
FIP3.453.25
WHIP1.181.10
K/98.39.1
BB/92.12.0
FIP−8378
WAR3.43.8

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticTrevor RogersBryan Woo
G12
GS00
IP1.24.1
W00
SV00
SO22
BB13
ERA10.806.23
WHIP3.001.62
K/910.84.2
BB/95.46.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticTrevor RogersBryan Woo
G132100
GS132100
IP689.2568.2
W3440
L4825
SV00
SO678567
BB234119
ERA3.883.45
WHIP1.271.02
K/98.89.0
BB/93.11.9
HR/90.91.1
WAR13.310.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.