Head to head · 2026 batting

Yordan Alvarez vs Vladimir Guerrero Jr.

In 2026 Yordan Alvarez has been worth 7.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Yordan Alvarez HOU

Vladimir Guerrero Jr.TOR

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Yordan Alvarez	Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
G	158	144
PA	692	609
H	179	141
HR	42	9
RBI	106	57
SB	1	7
AVG	.316	.260
OBP	.432	.332
SLG	.601	.358
OPS	1.033	.690
ISO	.286	.098
BB%	15.8%	9.2%
K%	17.3%	13.3%
wOBA	.430	.308
wRC+	182	93
WAR	7.5	0.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Yordan Alvarez	Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
G	62	24
PA	260	114
H	64	32
HR	12	8
RBI	41	16
BB	31	16
SO	71	12
SB	0	0
AVG	.288	.337
OBP	.385	.439
SLG	.536	.653
OPS	.921	1.091

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Yordan Alvarez	Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
G	835	1,119
PA	3,559	4,829
H	907	1,218
2B	190	237
3B	7	6
HR	212	192
RBI	599	648
BB	455	486
SO	686	726
SB	10	33
AVG	.300	.285
SLG	.578	.478
WAR	31.9	25.7

Yordan Alvarez’s full profile →Vladimir Guerrero Jr.’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Yordan Alvarez vs

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.