Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Isaac Paredes vs Tristan Peters

In 2026 Isaac Paredes has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 Wild Card Series, where the Chicago White Sox won 2-0 over the Houston Astros.

Isaac Paredes HOU

Tristan Peters CWS

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Isaac Paredes	Tristan Peters
G	2	2
PA	8	9
H	1	2
HR	0	0
RBI	0	1
BB	1	1
SO	2	2
SB	0	1
AVG	.167	.286
OBP	.375	.375
SLG	.167	.286
OPS	.542	.661

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Isaac Paredes	Tristan Peters
G	6	7
PA	20	24
H	6	6
HR	0	0
RBI	0	2
BB	2	2
SO	4	8
SB	0	1
AVG	.353	.286
OBP	.450	.348
SLG	.412	.333
OPS	.862	.681

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Isaac Paredes	Tristan Peters
G	155	150
PA	659	491
H	147	116
HR	25	12
RBI	94	56
SB	0	8
AVG	.262	.265
OBP	.360	.337
SLG	.447	.437
OPS	.806	.774
ISO	.185	.172
BB%	10.8%	7.5%
K%	13.4%	18.3%
wOBA	.358	.342
wRC+	130	118
WAR	4.3	3.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Isaac Paredes	Tristan Peters
G	712	154
PA	2,883	503
H	600	116
2B	114	31
3B	4	4
HR	117	12
RBI	381	56
BB	317	37
SO	475	97
SB	2	8
AVG	.242	.258
SLG	.433	.425
WAR	15.4	2.9

Isaac Paredes’s full profile →Tristan Peters’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Isaac Paredes vs

Tristan Peters vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.