Head to head · 2026 batting

Michael Harris II vs Ceddanne Rafaela

In 2026 Michael Harris II has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Michael Harris II ATL

Ceddanne Rafaela BOS

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Ceddanne Rafaela
G	155	136
PA	621	576
H	174	153
HR	26	16
RBI	87	70
SB	12	17
AVG	.294	.283
OBP	.321	.319
SLG	.491	.442
OPS	.812	.761
ISO	.196	.159
BB%	3.7%	3.8%
K%	19.2%	20.3%
wOBA	.350	.331
wRC+	120	107
WAR	4.4	2.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Ceddanne Rafaela
G	17	5
PA	65	19
H	17	0
HR	2	0
RBI	7	0
BB	1	2
SO	10	4
SB	2	0
AVG	.274	.000
OBP	.297	.105
SLG	.452	.000
OPS	.748	.105

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Ceddanne Rafaela
G	676	465
PA	2,712	1,823
H	713	443
2B	136	95
3B	16	12
HR	99	49
RBI	342	213
BB	108	69
SO	549	413
SB	82	59
AVG	.278	.258
SLG	.460	.414
WAR	16.3	6.5

Michael Harris II’s full profile →Ceddanne Rafaela’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Michael Harris II vs

Ceddanne Rafaela vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.