Head to head · 2026 batting

Otto Lopez vs Starling Marte

So far in 2026 Otto Lopez has been worth 5.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Otto Lopez MIA

Starling Marte KC

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Otto Lopez	Starling Marte
G	151	56
PA	660	168
H	185	37
HR	11	2
RBI	71	14
SB	32	2
AVG	.307	.242
OBP	.350	.298
SLG	.444	.314
OPS	.794	.611
ISO	.138	.072
BB%	5.8%	5.4%
K%	13.0%	24.4%
wOBA	.347	.278
wRC+	123	69
WAR	5.2	-0.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Otto Lopez	Starling Marte
G	411	1,260
PA	1,699	5,182
H	434	1,346
2B	76	238
3B	10	33
HR	32	135
RBI	190	573
BB	108	285
SO	245	989
SB	67	280
AVG	.278	.284
SLG	.401	.434
WAR	8.8	25.8

Otto Lopez’s full profile →Starling Marte’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Otto Lopez vs

Starling Marte vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.