Head to head · 2026 pitching

Brant Hurter vs Jakob Junis

So far in 2026 Jakob Junis has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Brant Hurter DET

Jakob Junis TEX

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Brant Hurter	Jakob Junis
G	26	50
GS	0	1
IP	31.2	51.2
W	4	1
SO	21	37
ERA	2.56	3.66
FIP	3.51	3.78
WHIP	1.04	1.22
K/9	6.0	6.4
BB/9	3.7	2.4
FIP−	84	90
WAR	0.4	0.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Brant Hurter	Jakob Junis
G	79	299
GS	5	117
IP	140.0	898.2
W	14	47
L	5	49
SV	2	8
SO	127	805
BB	46	230
ERA	2.51	4.32
WHIP	1.12	1.29
K/9	8.2	8.1
BB/9	3.0	2.3
HR/9	0.6	1.3
WAR	2.1	8.8

Brant Hurter’s full profile →Jakob Junis’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Brant Hurter vs

Jakob Junis vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.