Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting
Wilyer Abreu vs Trent Grisham
In 2026 Wilyer Abreu has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Wilyer Abreu | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2 | 2 |
| PA | 7 | 5 |
| H | 1 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 0 | 1 |
| SO | 2 | 0 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .143 | .500 |
| OBP | .143 | .600 |
| SLG | .143 | .500 |
| OPS | .286 | 1.100 |
| Statistic | Wilyer Abreu | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 31 |
| PA | 12 | 125 |
| H | 1 | 17 |
| HR | 0 | 3 |
| RBI | 0 | 7 |
| BB | 0 | 13 |
| SO | 5 | 43 |
| SB | 0 | 2 |
| AVG | .083 | .156 |
| OBP | .083 | .264 |
| SLG | .083 | .266 |
| OPS | .167 | .530 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Wilyer Abreu | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 157 | 120 |
| PA | 681 | 484 |
| H | 148 | 88 |
| HR | 24 | 18 |
| RBI | 76 | 59 |
| SB | 8 | 9 |
| AVG | .248 | .211 |
| OBP | .327 | .308 |
| SLG | .446 | .395 |
| OPS | .773 | .703 |
| ISO | .198 | .184 |
| BB% | 10.4% | 12.6% |
| K% | 20.7% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .337 | .314 |
| wRC+ | 111 | 93 |
| WAR | 2.7 | 1.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Wilyer Abreu | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 427 | 861 |
| PA | 1,630 | 3,315 |
| H | 365 | 616 |
| 2B | 94 | 125 |
| 3B | 6 | 14 |
| HR | 63 | 122 |
| RBI | 217 | 379 |
| BB | 160 | 402 |
| SO | 390 | 818 |
| SB | 25 | 59 |
| AVG | .253 | .217 |
| SLG | .457 | .399 |
| WAR | 6.8 | 13.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

