Head to head · 2025 batting

Brooks Baldwin vs Chas McCormick

In 2025 Brooks Baldwin has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Brooks Baldwin CWS

Chas McCormick HOU

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Brooks Baldwin	Chas McCormick
G	102	50
PA	328	116
H	72	21
HR	11	1
RBI	38	5
SB	5	2
AVG	.240	.210
OBP	.290	.279
SLG	.407	.290
OPS	.697	.569
ISO	.167	.080
BB%	6.4%	7.8%
K%	26.2%	26.7%
wOBA	.303	.260
wRC+	92	62
WAR	0.6	-0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Brooks Baldwin	Chas McCormick
G	135	452
PA	449	1,567
H	96	343
2B	21	52
3B	1	5
HR	13	56
RBI	46	196
BB	27	137
SO	117	430
SB	9	37
AVG	.232	.247
SLG	.382	.413
WAR	0.7	5.1

Brooks Baldwin’s full profile →Chas McCormick’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Brooks Baldwin vs

Chas McCormick vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.