Head to head · 2025 batting

Brooks Baldwin vs Otto Kemp

In 2025 Brooks Baldwin has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Brooks Baldwin CWS

Otto Kemp PHI

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Brooks Baldwin	Otto Kemp
G	102	62
PA	328	218
H	72	46
HR	11	8
RBI	38	28
SB	5	2
AVG	.240	.234
OBP	.290	.298
SLG	.407	.411
OPS	.697	.709
ISO	.167	.178
BB%	6.4%	5.5%
K%	26.2%	30.7%
wOBA	.303	.310
wRC+	92	92
WAR	0.6	0.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Brooks Baldwin	Otto Kemp
G	135	74
PA	449	245
H	96	48
2B	21	11
3B	1	0
HR	13	8
RBI	46	28
BB	27	13
SO	117	77
SB	9	2
AVG	.232	.216
SLG	.382	.374
WAR	0.7	0.0

Brooks Baldwin’s full profile →Otto Kemp’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Brooks Baldwin vs

Otto Kemp vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.